![]() |
|||
| Small Vigneron Awards | About Winewise | Subscribe | Lester's Imports |
OYSTERS & WINESex in a shell!
Glistening, salty oysters, evocative of nautical delights
- smiling at you provocatively from their freshly-severed
shells. You either love ’em or hate ’em. I love them - and I love wine - and recently had the
opportunity to evaluate the symbiosis between various varieties
of these two tasty treats. Ten oyster & wine enthusiasts joined
me at Jimmy G’s Oyster
Bar in the foodie end of Adelaide St, Brisbane, and we
diligently worked our way through the combinations of 9
reputedly oyster-friendly wines and 3 varieties of super-fresh
oysters. This sort
of event is often dreamed about but when you get down to it, the
logistics demand considerable structure and attention.
Nadine of Jimmy
G’s rolled out the event brilliantly, keeping up the
platters of oysters as needed to match our wine consumption - or
was it the other way around? - with plenty of bread and water to
clean the palate for the more serious digestibles.
Thanks to Jimmy G’s for a great night. The oysters selected for our evaluation
were: Tasmanian Pacifics - salty, sweet and
creamy; South Australian Pacifics - creamier and
fleshier than their Tassie relatives; and Sydney Rocks from Nambucca Heads - salty,
clean and crisp; - au naturel, of course. The wines, including a fair input of
European style, were 1
Muscadet
Chateau du Coing 2002 2
Soave
Fattori & Graney Classico Superiore 2001 3
Chablis
Louis Michel 2001 4
Semillon
Tyrrell’s Vat 1 2003 5
Bordeaux Blanc
Mouton-Cadet 2002 6
Sauvignon Blanc
Palliser
Estate Martinborough 2003 7
Riesling (Australian)
Mesh 2003 8
Riesling (Alsace)
Domaine Jean Luc Mader 2000 9
Pinot Gris
Trimbach Reserve 2000 Thanks to Jeffrey Power of
Cellar-One at
Brighton (Brisbane) for supplying most of the imported
wines. We proceeded through wine 1 and oyster A,
B & C; wine 2 and oyster A, B & C; etc., scoring each
combination out of 10 and discussing and noting the findings.
Tabling the scores gave me an empirical view of which
wine worked with which oyster, as well as demonstrating the
spread and diversity of opinions.
The average scores below may appear harsh, but this just
reflects critical comparative judging and the fact that what
works for someone certainly does not work for everyone.
Averaging better than 6.5 in this hard school is actually
pretty good and over 7 is very good.
This tough panel may go on to the next Olympic diving and
gymnastics judging. We had no trouble agreeing that the
oysters were all beautifully fresh and tasty and that the wines
were delightful in isolation.
Apart from one corked bottle replaced by a sub, the wines
opened beautifully. Seriously judging all the combinations, though, is not that
easy! Not everybody
completed the full course - however your dedicated scribe was
one that did, with considerable enthusiasm.
I’d always suspected that the
combinations of the acute yet subtle flavours of oysters and
white wines produce different reactions on different palates.
We got that. In
some cases, there were consistent reactions across the group
with everyone in a relatively narrow range of 6 to 8.
In others, we had a wide spread of scores - ranging in
some brackets from 3 to 9.
I’d say that the diverse opinions were prevalent in the
most piquant edgy flavour combinations - which some loved and
some hated. I noted
striking differences in the same judges’ ratings of the same
wine with the two types of Pacific oysters, confirming that
Pacific oysters from different regions have their own quite
distinct flavours. However, we pinpointed which combinations
worked best for the group and for us individually, and had a
great time doing it. You
might agree with our conclusions?
Or you might want to keep searching for your perfect
match - it’s a great treasure hunt. Scores below are the average across the
group for the combination of wine and oyster. Muscadet Tas Pacific
6.3 Some
supporters but several of us, including me, thought that the
oyster dominated the wine producing a slightly hard metallic
taste. SA Pacific
7.6 Big
difference with the creamier oyster, perhaps surprisingly,
attaining the highest average score on the night.
Most of the group enthused about the lift provided by the
muscadet and found an exceptional balance of complementary
flavours. Sydney rock
7.3 Very
wide range of opinions but overall second-highest average score.
Supporters found an exquisite flavour match; the minority
detractors thought the oyster removed some of the wine’s
sweetness. Soave Tas Pacific
7.1 This
worked well for everyone. Balance
of flavour and texture. Citrus
drive of the wine cut through the creamy oyster, producing a
satisfying lingering finish. SA Pacific
6.3 One
person loved it, most didn’t.
Oyster overpowered the wine, making it seem excessively
sweet. Sydney rock
6.5 General
agreement that this was an interesting but not brilliant
combination. Oyster
accentuated acid in the wine, causing a slight drying effect. Chablis Tas Pacific 6.9 A good texture match, well-liked by most. I thought the wine didn’t quite get up to the oyster’s sweetness. Conversely some thought the lemony flavour of the wine overran the oyster, but not to a displeasing extent. SA Pacific
7.2 Most
rated very highly - lemon and cream in beautiful harmony. The detractor (me!) found a cancelling rather than enhancing
effect - I might have to try another dozen. Sydney rock
7.1 Oyster
narrowly won the battle here, stripping some flavour out of the
wine. However the
result was still pleasing to most, finding lemon and cream in
abundant harmony. Semillon Tas Pacific 6.1 Two judges didn’t like this, commenting that the wine was too light and the oyster too dominant. Most thought it OK but not exciting. It worked very well for me. SA Pacific
6.4 Some
found an excellent match here, with the clean interplay of fresh
lime from the wine meeting the creamy oyster on equal terms.
However most were not overly excited. Sydney rock
6.8 Well
received but some found the oyster dominating.
Several, including me, found the classic cutting effect
of the wine’s acid revealing the straight- out-of-the-ocean
fresh taste of the oyster. Bordeaux blanc Tas Pacific 7.1 Consistent ratings across the board. The firm structure of the wine stood up well to the oyster, providing a contented balance. Not really exhilarating, but pleasingly reliable and satisfying. SA Pacific
6.8 Very
similar to the other pacific, except that the oyster curtailed
the finish of the wine somewhat.
Good safe pairing. Sydney rock
6.1 Some
of us found the oyster dominating here.
Interesting, as the Sydney rock is usually thought to be
more delicate. The
extra saltiness seemed to strain the wine. Sauvignon blanc Tas Pacific 7.1 Some commented that this wine was too ripe and short on acid for oysters. However it worked well with this oyster in a different way to the other combinations. Pineapple flavours came to the fore, giving a pleasant tropical island oyster-eating impression. Very interesting. SA Pacific
6.3 The
stronger of the pacifics seemed to be at odds with the wine,
resulting in herbaceous earthy sensations.
Interesting but certainly not to everybody’s liking. Sydney rock
6.2 The
diversity of flavours here produced the widest range of
opinions. Some
found it unacceptable, I found it bland and disengaging, but
another got past the initial dominance of the wine to claim
accentuated richness in the oyster.
This combination seemed to be the most profound personal
palate preference. Australian Riesling Tas Pacific
6.8 A
consistent rater, all within 2 points.
Pretty good but not quite enough acid to promote the
oyster’s finer points. Wine
dominated rather than married the oyster, but the alternating
flavour sensations were pleasing. SA Pacific
6.9 Also
consistently good ratings.
The fleshier SA pacific stood up to the strong citrus
characters of the wine somewhat better, giving a better balance
and accentuating the oyster’s richness. Sydney rock
7.0 The
forum generally appreciated the classic lemon and seafood union,
accentuating each other and forming strong lingering tastes.
I wasn’t convinced, finding the wine just too full on
for the comparatively delicate oyster. Alsace Riesling Tas Pacific 5.9 The lowest average rating in the tasting, but still with a couple of supporters. For most of us, the power and grip of the wine did nothing to enhance the oyster - poles apart in flavour and texture. SA Pacific
7.0 As
with the Aussie riesling, the fleshier SA pacific handled the
sharpness of the wine somewhat better, showing off its creamy
texture. Sydney rock
6.1 Most
were reasonably happy with this combination.
I found that the wine didn’t clean the oyster but
produced a somewhat astringent edge accentuating the briny
aspect. Pinot Gris Tas Pacific 6.3 Wonderful wine, but couldn’t quite cut the oysters. They were on par for texture, but on a different course for flavour. I was fascinated by the disparity of the wonderful flavours of both wine and oyster, and actually enjoyed the contrast. However another judge could not stand it at all. SA Pacific
6.7 As
above, two separate joys rather than a combination, but the
stronger oyster shone a little more here. Sydney rock
6.7 Again,
contrast rather than harmony, but in an exciting way. Sort of like a Picasso painting of a beautiful girl - you
appreciate what you’re viewing but wonder if she was better in
the natural state. (Well,
after 27 oyster and wine shots, you get a bit whimsical!) And the winners on the night were -Top combination was the Muscadet with SA
Pacific. Second ranking also went to the Muscadet,
with Sydney rock. With Tasmanian Pacific, the Bordeaux blanc
rated highest, to our collective surprise. The Chablis rated highly with all the
oysters. A relatively low rating for Muscadet with
Tasmanian pacific reduced the Muscadet’s across the board
average to equal first with the Chablis. The most wine-friendly oyster, narrowly
over the other two, was the SA Pacific. The wines in this tasting made strong
statements within their respective styles.
There are many subtleties in play in oyster/wine matching
and it would be rash to conclude that you would always get the
same results from other wines of the same genre. Lester and friends reported the results of
a similar exercise in Winewise
Vol 17 No 3 August 2001. The most notable divergent result between
then and now was the race up the oyster-complementing rankings
of the Chateau du Coing Muscadet (1997 used then, 2002 in this
round) from an also-ran to a starring role. This is most likely
due to the use of a younger wine this time. We struck some accords with the earlier
evaluations - Chablis proved again to be a classic
partner for oysters. Semillon suited Sydney rocks better than
Pacifics. Fruity Australian rieslings require
strong-flavoured oysters. No surprises there. Reflecting now on the event, I keep
thinking of the marvellous cuisines of our master chefs Tetsuya
Wakuda and Cheong Liew, in the sense that their mastery of
flavour combinations and juxtaposing surprising ingredients to
amalgamate and/or contrast components and enhance the whole
result far beyond expectation is just the sort of thing I’m
looking for in an oyster and a mouthful of wine, albeit on a
simpler stage. For
me personally, the combinations of Muscadet with Sydney rock and
Semillon with Sydney rock landed in Tetsuya territory of
delicate entwining flavours, while the Pinot Gris with Sydney
rock took me to Cheong’s land of contrast and piquant
highlight. Isn’t life grand!
Now if I can talk the editor into an oyster and champagne
event...... Cheers.
Bob Clancy
|